I purchased the Hoka Mach back in February 2018 but never got around to doing a review of the shoe. I recently purchased a second pair, so it seemed like a good time to do so. Here's a good review of the Mach by Ben Zuehlsdorf at URP.
Showing posts with label Clifton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clifton. Show all posts
Monday, August 13, 2018
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Altra Torin 3.5 Knit review - best Torin yet
This is the third generation of Torins I've worn, and the first where Altra knocked it out of the park by creating an extremely comfortable daily trainer.
Friday, November 17, 2017
Hoka OneOne Clifton 4 Review: 4th time a charm?
The Clifton line from Hoka has always been one step away from a great shoe for me.
The first iteration was a revolutionary shoe, combining heavy cushion with lightness. Unfortunately, the thin tongue killed it as a wearable shoe although most other reviewers loved that feature and the model overall.
The second version mucked up nearly everything good in an attempt to remedy the tongue issue. Unfortunately, the changes to the rest of the upper and the midsole were counterproductive in my experience; I found it to be a hot and overly firm ride.
The third version got the closest in my book to a big winner, but the upper really couldn't stand up to the beating I delivered during DC summers. http://www.midpackgear.com/2016/08/170-mile-revisit-of-clifton-3-not-so_18.html
So is the fourth time a charm? Through the first 40+ miles, I'd say yes.
Labels:
altra,
Clifton,
Clifton 2,
clifton 3,
clifton 4,
hoka,
hoka one one,
hoka oneone,
wide toe box
Saturday, July 1, 2017
Altra Torin 3.0 review
Upgrades to good shoes get me nervous. The Torin 2.5 is a great all-around trainer. However, nothing's perfect - it has a few drawbacks spelled out in my earlier review.
Edit 7/25/18: Altra Torin 3.5 knit review here.
![]() |
Torin 2.5 |
- The midsole is very "foamy" - meaning it is soft and cushioned but doesn't have much responsiveness. It feels pretty dead when I am out on a run - like there is a lot of energy lost on impact with no bounce.
- The wear pattern on the rubber pods on the outsole is uneven and early. I was seeing too much wear even with +/- 50 miles on the shoe for a $120+ purchase.
- Others have complained about the plastic-y upper material that isn't very breathable. I didn't think it was that bad - it has mesh areas on right/left of your big toe that allowed breatheability - but it was certainly not the most airy upper I've worn.
Altra's Torin 3.0 seems to have successfully addressed each of these issues.
The midsole has a little bit of bounceback sorely missing from the last version. According to the Altra website, they haven't made a change in the midsole material - still "Midsole Eva With A-Bound Top Layer & InnerFlex™." I don't believe it. While it's nowhere as bouncy as Ego, it has something else in there that is an improvement. A Torin with Ego is something to dream about...
The wear is improved for me. I'm around 46 miles and the rear outer pod on the heel is not worn down to the foam. Hopefully it can hold out for a good while longer.
![]() |
Torin 3.0 |
![]() |
Not so good on the Torin 2.5 |
Altra has also shaved off .7 oz - always good to see when a manufacturer can go lighter in an upgrade without destroying the shoe's good qualities. They possibly shaved some weight off the upper or even out of the midsole.
The shoe's upper is definitely much more breatheable compared to its predecessor. I have run under blazing hot summer conditions in DC and on a 4 hour trail race and my shoe hasn't turned into a sweatlodge. It's obvious how much breatheability is built into the upper - just hold it up to a light to see how much light gets through.
I referred to this shoe earlier as a Clifton that fit me right. I think that anyone looking for a cushioned zero drop shoe who has liked the Clifton but found one aspect or another of that shoe lacking (the Clifton 3.0 upper wore badly and stretched out, the 2.0 midsole was too hard, the 1.0 tongue didn't work for me) should check out the Torin 3.0.
Edit 10/10/17: The upper and the midsole of the shoe is holding up nicely through 150 miles. No wear or tear is visible on the mesh; the midsole has a lot of cushioning remaining by feel. The rubber pads on the outer heel are starting to wear away as with the 2.5. I'm still very positive on this update despite this issue which needs to get addressed by Altra on the next version of this shoe.
Edit 10/10/17: The upper and the midsole of the shoe is holding up nicely through 150 miles. No wear or tear is visible on the mesh; the midsole has a lot of cushioning remaining by feel. The rubber pads on the outer heel are starting to wear away as with the 2.5. I'm still very positive on this update despite this issue which needs to get addressed by Altra on the next version of this shoe.
Edit 7/25/18: Altra Torin 3.5 knit review here.
Thursday, July 7, 2016
Hoka One One Clifton 3 review highlights
I've had a mixed experience with the Clifton line from Hoka One One. The first edition was exciting and promising - I loved the super light cushioned feel of the shoe apart from the flimsy tongue which made it hard for me to get a proper locked down upper.
The second edition was better on the tongue - they padded it properly - but the combination of the shoddy build quality (the overlays started peeling away within weeks) and the slightly cramped toebox compared to the similar but more comfy Challenger ATR 2s made it a no go for me.
The Clifton 3 just hit the streets, and the third time is the proverbial charm here. The biggest change is the substitution of the upper material - it went from a tighter nylon weave to a stretchy mesh. Look here - how when I flex my toe you can actually see it through the mesh.
This material is very similar to what Skechers used for their excellent GOrun Ride 3 shoe - which was quite comfortable but a little too loose for faster running. The Clifton 3 does a better job of holding your foot in place but still allowing enough give in the upper to prevent rubbing/hotspots. Much more give than the upper material on the Challenger ATR 2, a good thing for non-trail running imo.
The lacing system is Goldilocks perfect for me. Easy to get a good fit without having to over- or under-cinch.
The toebox is great - even more roomy and comfortable than the Challenger ATR 2s that I love.
The midsole is a little more squishy and has more rebound at the same time than the 2. The 2 felt more like an inert foam - the three combines a bit of a rubber ball feel with some sponginess. I'd still give it a 7.5 (with 10 being the softest).
The outer seems unchanged to me - it remains great. A big footprint, nice traction, rubber reinforcement on the right spots.
I'll report back if anything changes, but this is a super update. I've done two runs on them with no issues. Hopefully the overlays will stay in place and I won't experience the iffy quality I've seen in past Hokas. As of now: If you are a fan, go for it.
100+ mile update
Review of the next model update - the Clifton 4
The second edition was better on the tongue - they padded it properly - but the combination of the shoddy build quality (the overlays started peeling away within weeks) and the slightly cramped toebox compared to the similar but more comfy Challenger ATR 2s made it a no go for me.
The Clifton 3 just hit the streets, and the third time is the proverbial charm here. The biggest change is the substitution of the upper material - it went from a tighter nylon weave to a stretchy mesh. Look here - how when I flex my toe you can actually see it through the mesh.
This material is very similar to what Skechers used for their excellent GOrun Ride 3 shoe - which was quite comfortable but a little too loose for faster running. The Clifton 3 does a better job of holding your foot in place but still allowing enough give in the upper to prevent rubbing/hotspots. Much more give than the upper material on the Challenger ATR 2, a good thing for non-trail running imo.
The lacing system is Goldilocks perfect for me. Easy to get a good fit without having to over- or under-cinch.
The toebox is great - even more roomy and comfortable than the Challenger ATR 2s that I love.
The midsole is a little more squishy and has more rebound at the same time than the 2. The 2 felt more like an inert foam - the three combines a bit of a rubber ball feel with some sponginess. I'd still give it a 7.5 (with 10 being the softest).
The outer seems unchanged to me - it remains great. A big footprint, nice traction, rubber reinforcement on the right spots.
I'll report back if anything changes, but this is a super update. I've done two runs on them with no issues. Hopefully the overlays will stay in place and I won't experience the iffy quality I've seen in past Hokas. As of now: If you are a fan, go for it.
100+ mile update
Review of the next model update - the Clifton 4
Labels:
challenger atr,
Clifton,
Clifton 2,
clifton 3,
hoka,
skechers gorun ride 3
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)